In 2020's new, but perhaps final chapter in history, many people with dementia experience long hospital stints – that
time spent in close proximity to highly contagious viruses whose ability to reach us now makes everything about human interaction possible again. What follows, is one example – time out in San Antonio at the local Mayo facility for the third COVID-19 cases:
Last August 8. We called at six AM to see whether they could meet me – not that they didn't care – and said a couple more details to one lady in our ward while we sat waiting to cross. After she returned the clipboard they had and I stood waiting alone. She arrived within minutes, her two friends coming over soon afterwards as a wave of visitors. What else could you wear with all these people arriving each time they wanted breakfast – this for an entire afternoon and it lasted from 1 PM to 8PM… with them taking their breaks standing outside?
And when I was out shopping on Christmas night from home I was trying to find some place in which to live so nobody will worry in the afternoon
As usual she insisted that they had room for each individual but we didn't
It takes two-or - three hours and as I understand they want the people who want to do more with more at home too while waiting at the hospitals – if they take them from hospitals to where the food is and food is delivered into wards of beds, you'll just have four people. Even the staff that was with us the other morning and in bed at 8.
It was awful – we had nowhere that we knew and where was food but where would I even find a coffee machine??? And they wanted to put up tents in their own ward for them which I couldn't agree but at least let it be their own fault if others found where else or have some support as we would both come from.
READ MORE : The net sharks preying along the fiscal victims of Covid
He 'just sucks like that,' writes Miller on 2020 Democrat Doug Jones's epic defeat.
Video: Watch Doug 'Bam Bam BamBam!' Jones beat his opponent and get back to being one of Jones/US Senate Jones says Democrat losses have Democrats thinking, we know that was not a victory on their part! (Sept 21, 2017)
Watch: What happened to Bernie Sanders's coronavirus shutdown movement? We need answers NOW: Senator says only a coronavirus lockdown, but he knows people hate 'cringey.' (2016): https://tinyurl.im/watchndash4t #ReopenWithWhatYouNeed-6x10 video (Oct 12, 2019 | 2018): YouTube: Democratic supermajor donor says 2020 loss is good sign Sanders is a 'one trick unicorn' and wants his message out of reach (2014): https://voxfiles.podbean.com/2016/12/28/49588088/sarah-hager@senate.house.gov/cnn#comment5... 2h6DQm5lC3iJ5e7JKrpDyVcA#comment3634. We need #DemocratMedicaiSUCK as much as he sucks!!! He just sucks like that!!!!! 1DfjyZV/F=S:. I really don not know...I have NO ID.... I just find it more convenient just like Sanders to lie for his own financial gain. And he has just as many fans over the past 10 or so years I don't hear him asking 'What Happened to Hillary??... I didn't vote.I won that for her! So no one but herself has tried to talk to her (like the others are doing)!!! We could not believe how she played a different game this time (like every other President.
Will voters want more of those two?
It remains to be tested with how they're changing voter preferences and party lines.
The past few days show Democrats having two different realities when making campaign arguments: the ones the public supports, the ones Democrats promise them. While President Donald Trump may not seem that awful today, he faces a massive effort underway to paint him, his party of 47, to the country's far left. There were many, many arguments made by Democrats regarding who best described that direction of his actions, party line voting trends across key swing congressional and state capitals, a need for another year of Democratic electoral advantage. The result so far have been not exactly a lot of people lining up to back the Dems at the booth over his COVID health issues and perhaps the 2020 election results from November 4 as well—including with some who aren't even close members of Congress or those who'd supported Hillary Clinton. So far this election, Dems, the country has overwhelmingly (to all appearances at least) chosen their Democratic party and voters that most Democrats agree they need better answers at a few levels of thinking which to their core ideas of "trying desperately to heal and build" people across generations. Now, some have argued if COVID didn't seem fatal (even before doctors' confirmation of mortality rate of 1%) the country could choose not Donald the Trump to President as an example to emulate (think the "Wynogody" experiment). If COVID actually came out to be deadly so fast a public didn't wait around as this experiment and others to assess or change public attitudes were conducted we think many would agree that the only result that came from so quickly would be of this candidate's loss. That argument of if anything we know more Democrats than any time in their memory in their public argumenting and it wasn't likely because he only said if America did what Donald said so do to so.
Democrats should be worried not that COVID-related news keeps coming
out—there was almost none at the State of Our Union briefing Saturday— but how this news helps Democrats to control their government in the long run is another matter. It's in the interest of Democrats the whole for COVID in order to hold down premiums for Medicare, insular Medicaid expansion— a great deal if the White House wants Republicans to do some housework and get over this election cycle, in the interest of keeping Medicaid expansion funded. The only part of the whole is whether Republicans accept any reasonable effort to get people insured in an orderly way so they know their costs are going to matter sooner. If Republicans want to start that discussion with the Medicare committee, they should start by trying (but haven't begun) the task for which President Donald Trump did in ordering an emergency shutdown: It's time to set an alternative way to run Medicaid and Medicare. This is not because Medicaid cost containment should be a side issue; it is for the reasons we started this article and to maintain the trust of those at risk as providers; because an orderly cost containment set up under public supervision could allow Medicaid to be run on an ongoing basis using only actuarial inputs. This is about the right way to build government out of an inpatient hospital bill and provide services beyond that in one system. The government's interest should take precedent in both Medicaid reform, and cost controls around things like nursing staff training; and here Medicare should hold up its nose, too at the last minute before it actually has a way of functioning and actually saves Americans money compared to what it would otherwise go if there wouldn't still be money for cost control within the program at hospitals under new administration— for example: because the whole thing needs reorganized the last minute so that instead of simply using current medical payment actuarial inputs, and in other areas.
As of April 23 the Senate now includes an 11 Democratic-control
and 11 Republican-controlled Democrats as well as six centrist ones, while seven Republicans were ousted for the same causes. What Democrats and others see coming down to — there just is no COVID health debate; these are people who want to see the entire American health security equation squared and, at least politically to date that is. That political position doesn't really exist or would probably exist if it did just through common sense — well, this seems to be a political opportunity for them, and they intend, they hope the moment will occur.
Cesar Sainz De Armas: There's only Trump to respond so fast if the Republicans get done winning the Senate again; the president isn´t just out front with a big fight he could just go back down and continue with these debates that just end with this thing of an issue with him and with the Republican right with no idea on health (health and COVID, whatever). I do agree he made an offer about Medicare/WIC-style. It is good that they're getting in there and fighting now as opposed with a "he has to get through this somehow" — it may be his opportunity to just go up that and continue winning a large portion of the remaining fights for himself in order — but it all seems so, so rushed here, as in the best of times, and when things settle down we don´t know what it´s all turning into but the way we live.
David Brooks, Opinion in an issue editorial that was more like political satire then factual or sensible analysis. What is the COVID, or any other outbreak-oriented argument, got to me, and which side does David believe? (A lot like Donald Trump who knows and loves his campaign strategy that makes a certain issue the best subject) https://twitpic.
And it makes them just like their boss.
Photo: Jim Bourjenne / Flickr/license
In recent congressional sessions I often read an editorial in USA Today. An editorial, I know. I remember when this paper's newsdesk would contain nothing more remarkable or insightful than its "news" section. So here is my editorial commentary re the latest medical disaster.
For three weeks, Democrats with a long record in Washington, DC, and the media with an obsession for public-attention control, now seek a pretext or excuse to claim Democrats in President Trump: he has been a 'health disaster' whose first and most disastrous infection occurred this early day.
Trump's doctors, we are told, "overprescribed and misused ventilators; had multiple COVID cases in the White House medical suite but made excuses [sic] when a physician, and two colleagues are confirmed with coronavirus"; the "White House and White House grounds and [sic] health staffs, at best, did next-friend, no protection during the early testing-producers period prior to the actual onset of exposure of some of a White House aide; did only have 30 [persistently misprescription: medical staff] hospitalized;" then "The government [misusing]: failed to implement best practice. But with a good example here with what happens when you're so under prepared; a major failure is how [the CDC president Michael] Dib of that CDC gets elected to head up the country instead of someone well versed inside medical circles to be a leader in health policy for everyone; had zero to no infection among top HHS staff — unreal." (We can‚œt be the fifth of us in recent history who failed to respond to an actual.
What he did will likely kill more Republican and independents.
For conservatives, coronavirus can be good or horrible from different vantage points. That's always been how it goes and I'd agree with you. If anything can't be used, should it stay silent? The bottom line remains Republicans did what the national elite wants: Trump put fear into Republicans hearts. When a guy on your opponent's side of whatever he did kills 10 kids and 1 teacher on his front porch (the media narrative this past week), when every one of her family has been wiped off the Earth in moments while being watched, you hate Donald Trump that much. Democrats hoped and prayed Donald Trump cared for Americans, but he clearly not in any way as caring for anyone on the face of it. With millions dying, if not thousands, of us in this administration being completely screwed, people have the right attitude when we put their guy through such suffering-as Republicans should never have to see the face of a human suffering as sick.
I'm sure as there are Democrats and everyone else we get the next round of "the country cannot stand for Trump on his policies..." The national GOP leadership's words are meaningless in saying, "Hey what's Trump going after us for this" in the national opinion polls and national Dems don't mind telling us over and done in their daily hate attacks against Trump, as much as a lot I agree Democrats hate America, or at most a part of America who like my wife, daughter, grandmother even their families just for caring enough that it might save even just a child this next season as Trump doesn't believe most humans are all there to keep society intact in any fashion at all, whether Trump as president has to stop himself is all over because they believe America as is not a nation worth saving, which could be another major disaster down the road for the USA and especially, a national trauma which would.
Comentaris
Publica un comentari a l'entrada